Let’s say money isn’t an issue, which US city would you move to? (You can only live in 1 place as a main residence aka you have to spend at least between 6-7 months there)

33 comments

  1. Provided my girlfriend would go with it (in real life, she wouldn’t), Juneau, Alaska.

  2. Greater Cincinnati, it’s home and I happen to love it
    if I had to choose another city probably Boston

  4. Great question. Probably DC, Chicago as a close second, then Philly third for me.

  9. New York City is a fantastic place to live if you are rich. I would definitely live there in my fantasy scenario.

  10. Somewhere that is in the middle of nowhere, I suppose if it has to be an incorporated city, the smallest population with the largest area. Likely in Kentucky, western North Carolina, East Tennessee, or western Virginia.

    Since money isn’t an issue, I’d just buy the largest plot of land available, and raise goats

  18. I’d move into a nicer apartment I guess, but I’m not leaving home

  19. Monterrey California. Great restaurants, amazing weather, fishing and a world class racetrack (Laguna Seca).

  20. Laguna Beach CA

    Gotta have a dog friendly yard though, and would sacrifice a few steps from the beach for that

  25. San Diego has been good to me. I’d stay where I am and just get a bigger place.

  28. I would choose Minneapolis alongside Lake of the Isles.

    If I was to leave Minnesota, I would pick Boston

  29. Malibu, assuming I’m so rich that I can afford to employ a driver so I never have to drive in LA traffic.

  33. No one has said Sedona Az yet so I will take it. Spectacular city but not many job opportunities.

Leave a Reply
You May Also Like